Skip to main content

How the WB3 / WP3.3 methodology was used

Table 2 gives an overview on how the different study sites used the WP3.3 methodology.

Table 2: Overview on how the WP 3.3 methodology was used

Study site How was WB3 methodology used? Comments
1 Spain
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
2 Portugal, Maçao / Góis
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
3 Italy
  • Own approach of stakeholder consultations used
Not considered for synthesis
4 Greece, Crete
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
5 Greece, Nestos Basin
  • Own methodology (training seminar), partly with elements from the guidelines
Only partly considered for synthesis
6 Turkey, Karapinar
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
7 Turkey, Eskisehir
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
8 Morocco
  • According to guidelines, some adaptations:
  • 1 day WS
  • Didn't use Facilitator Software in the workshop
  • Skipped step 8
9 Tunisia
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
10 Russia, Djanybek
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
11 Russia, NovySaratov
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
12 China
  • According to guidelines; some adaptations:
  • Started reviewing the cycles etc. as many participants were new (but came from the same organisation)
  • WS duration 4 days
13 Botswana
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations
  • Combined step 3 and 5 (selection and ranking of criteria)
14 Mexico
  • No workshop conducted
Not considered for synthesis
15 Chile
  • According to guidelines, some adaptations:
  • 1 day WS
  • Didn't use Facilitator Software
16 Cape Verde
  • According to guidelines; minor adaptations