Home Ribeira Seca, Cape Verde Selecting strategies: Stakeholder Workshop 2

Selecting strategies: Stakeholder Workshop 2 Print

Results and conclusions from Stakeholder Workshop 2 "Selection and decision on technologies/approaches to be implemented", held in the Ribeira Seca Watershed, Santiago Island, Cape Verde, March 18th – 20th, 2009.

Authors: Jacques Tavares and Isaurinda Baptista.

 

The workshop methodology was designed and coordinated through Research Theme 3: Potential prevention & mitigation strategies and consisted of three main elements:

  • A participatory approach to guide and lead the workshop participants through a process of multi-criteria evaluation of different options which finally results in decision-making on strategies to be field-tested.
  • The WOCAT database containing locally applied options as well as options from a number of other contexts.
  • 'Facilitator', a Multi Objective Decision Support System (MODSS) software to support the single steps of the evaluation and decision-making process.

Target groups were the same as in the 1st workshop: local stakeholders (land users, representatives of local authorities, local NGOs) and external stakeholders (researchers, development professionals, NGOs, GOs).

 

 

As a result of the workshop, the following measures were selected for testing in field experiments.

 

Measures Specifications Type Land use
Forestation according to the climate for each zone of the study site
Green belts on slopes Combination between Aloe vera and Cajanus cajan or Leucaena leucocephala vegetative cropland

 

More details ... download full report and see general results and conclusions from other study sites

WP3.3 Stakeholder Workshop 2 Cape Verde (report)

»Selecting strategies: Stakeholder Workshop 2 methodology and summary results from all study sites

 

 
fig0.jpg.jpg

Acknowledgement

fp6 logo 3 50 x 43
The DESIRE project was 
co-funded by the
European Commission,
Global Change and
Ecosystem.
DESIRE brought together the expertise of
26 international research institutes
and non-governmental organisations.
This website does not necessarily
represent the opinion of the
European Commission. The European
Commission is not responsible for
any use that might be made of the
information contained herein.

Follow us